This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author xavieryao
Recipients xavieryao
Date 2022-02-03.04:46:26
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1643863586.75.0.713225774424.issue46621@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Currently, StopIteration raised accidentally inside the `function` being applied is not caught by map(). This will cause the iteration of the map object to terminate silently. (Whereas, when some other exception is raised, a traceback is printed pinpointing the cause of the problem.)

Here's a minimal working example:

```
def take_first(it: Iterable):
    # if `it` is empty, StopIteration will be raised accidentally
    return next(it) 

iterables = [iter([1]), iter([]), iter([2, 3])] # the second one is empty
for i in map(take_first, iterables):
    print(i)
```

`take_first` function didn't consider the case where `it` is empty. The programmer would expect an uncaught StopIteration, instead of the loop terminating silently after only one iteration.

Similar to the case of generators (described in PEP 497), this behaviour can conceal obscure bugs, and a solution could be catching StopIteration when applying the function, and replacing it with a RuntimeError.

Beside the built-in map(), imap() and imap_unordered() in the concurrent and multiprocessing modules also have similar behaviour.


PEP 479 -- Change StopIteration handling inside generators https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0479/
History
Date User Action Args
2022-02-03 04:46:26xavieryaosetrecipients: + xavieryao
2022-02-03 04:46:26xavieryaosetmessageid: <1643863586.75.0.713225774424.issue46621@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-02-03 04:46:26xavieryaolinkissue46621 messages
2022-02-03 04:46:26xavieryaocreate