This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ferdnyc
Recipients docs@python, eric.araujo, ferdnyc, jacksonbrummell1
Date 2022-01-08.10:10:24
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1641636624.81.0.146860887358.issue46279@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
TBH, personally I don't think I'd just reword it with "below". That seems like the path of least resistance, but then the sentence becomes this:

"""
This won’t work for __main__.py files in the root directory of a .zip file though. Hence, for consistency, minimal __main__.py like the venv one mentioned below are preferred.
"""

Doesn't really track. How can you draw conclusions ("Hence...") from something that hasn't even been discussed yet?

It might actually be better to just drop the mention of venv from that particular sentence. The see-also text introduces *itself* as an example of what was just discussed. There's no real reason to bring it up ahead of time, because the see-also already flows naturally from the previous discussion without any setup.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-01-08 10:10:24ferdnycsetrecipients: + ferdnyc, eric.araujo, docs@python, jacksonbrummell1
2022-01-08 10:10:24ferdnycsetmessageid: <1641636624.81.0.146860887358.issue46279@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-01-08 10:10:24ferdnyclinkissue46279 messages
2022-01-08 10:10:24ferdnyccreate