➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pablogsal
Recipients eric.smith, nanjekyejoannah, pablogsal, rhettinger, terry.reedy
Date 2022-01-06.20:24:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1641500644.85.0.262728221374.issue46280@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Anyway, (if I'm right,) this makes my points that a) there are false positives, and b) we should have separate issues for each actual problem.

Sorry Eric, I failed to clarify my comment: you are absolutely right in your analysis. I was trying to backtrack what the tool is thinking and how that code could result in an initialized read based only on static analysis.

Your analysis is right and these are indeed false positives. Apologies for the confusion :)
History
Date User Action Args
2022-01-06 20:24:04pablogsalsetrecipients: + pablogsal, rhettinger, terry.reedy, eric.smith, nanjekyejoannah
2022-01-06 20:24:04pablogsalsetmessageid: <1641500644.85.0.262728221374.issue46280@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-01-06 20:24:04pablogsallinkissue46280 messages
2022-01-06 20:24:04pablogsalcreate