Message408696
Such change would break a lot of existing interfaces.
* addUnexpectedSuccess() has a single parameter. The change will add the second parameter and will break subclasses of TestResult.
* addExpectedFailure() has two parameter. The change will add the third parameter and will break subclasses of TestResult.
* unexpectedSuccesses is a list of tests. The change will make it a list of 2-tuples and will break users of TestResult.
* expectedFailures is a list of 2-tuples. The change will make it a list of 3-tuples and will break users of TestResult.
It is too destructive change. I think we can live without a message argument for expectedFailure(). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-12-16 12:15:32 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, barry, rbcollins, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, adam-collard, santoso.wijaya |
2021-12-16 12:15:32 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1639656932.13.0.426299728165.issue12681@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-12-16 12:15:32 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue12681 messages |
2021-12-16 12:15:32 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|