Message407784
> How realistic is this scenario? If you compile with, for example 3.14.0 or
> newer, you'd link with sqlite3_trace_v2, not sqlite3_trace, so the loader
> would prevent you from running with anything pre 3.14. AFAIK, we've never
> had such problems.
I mean, after this change, different versions of SQLite will behave differently. And give a message for SQLITE_ABORT_ROLLBACK to explain this problem.
> It is a change of behaviour of the internal machinery. Does the change lead
> to wrong results (duplicate rows, wrong rows returned, no rows returned)?
> Corrupted/garbage data? Non-deterministic behaviour? Does any of the API's
> provided by sqlite3 not behave according to the documentation anymore?
It just leaks resource, apart from this, there seems to be no problem. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-12-06 10:30:32 | malin | set | recipients:
+ malin, lemburg, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, erlendaasland |
2021-12-06 10:30:32 | malin | set | messageid: <1638786632.09.0.220750844955.issue44092@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-12-06 10:30:32 | malin | link | issue44092 messages |
2021-12-06 10:30:32 | malin | create | |
|