Author v+python
Recipients Jim.Jewett, amaury.forgeotdarc, andyharrington, berker.peksag, docs@python, erob, flox, ggenellina, iritkatriel, levkivskyi, mutley89, oopos, orsenthil, python-dev, quentel, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, tcourbon, tobias, v+python, vstinner
Date 2021-11-30.20:00:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1638302437.78.0.515785785229.issue11352@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Seems like another example of the CGI module not getting much support. While I haven't looked at all the details of the patches, it seems that several people have contributed enhancements or clarifications. and it would be a shame to discard them rather than merge the submissions... but it seems no one with authority wants to support CGI.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-11-30 20:00:37v+pythonsetrecipients: + v+python, amaury.forgeotdarc, ggenellina, orsenthil, vstinner, andyharrington, r.david.murray, oopos, tcourbon, tobias, flox, sandro.tosi, docs@python, quentel, erob, python-dev, berker.peksag, Jim.Jewett, mutley89, levkivskyi, iritkatriel
2021-11-30 20:00:37v+pythonsetmessageid: <1638302437.78.0.515785785229.issue11352@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-11-30 20:00:37v+pythonlinkissue11352 messages
2021-11-30 20:00:37v+pythoncreate