Message406802
A new `intermediate_mode=` kwarg can't _default_ to `mode=` as that would flip flop the API's default behavior again and no doubt disrupt someone elses 3.7-3.10 authored code depending on it. :(
Regardless I do somewhat like `intermediate_mode=` more than the PR's existing `recursive_mode=` as it opens up more possible behaviors... Allowing `None` to mean "use `mode=`" is desirable as that'll likely be the most common case. As I expect this to be very common, an easier to type name than intermediate_mode is desirable. Brainstorming:
* mid_mode?
* submode?
* imode?
My preference leans towards the latter names. Probably `submode=`. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-11-22 21:16:30 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients:
+ gregory.p.smith, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka, ZackerySpytz, JustAnotherArchivist, kartiksubbarao, awtimmering |
2021-11-22 21:16:30 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1637615790.19.0.423556601644.issue42367@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-11-22 21:16:30 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue42367 messages |
2021-11-22 21:16:30 | gregory.p.smith | create | |
|