This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author harahu
Recipients docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, harahu, mdk, rhettinger, willingc
Date 2021-11-17.22:33:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1637188395.64.0.95734469677.issue45832@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Might i then suggest mentioning in the docs that this assumes the invariance, combined with a backlink to the definition, instead of a full repeat?

I'm sure the hash invariant is well known to you guys, working on python, but I was genuinely surprised by this behaviour.

Not sure I should be ashamed or not, given that my job has revolved around python for the last couple of years.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-11-17 22:33:15harahusetrecipients: + harahu, rhettinger, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, willingc, mdk
2021-11-17 22:33:15harahusetmessageid: <1637188395.64.0.95734469677.issue45832@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-11-17 22:33:15harahulinkissue45832 messages
2021-11-17 22:33:15harahucreate