Author haberman2
Recipients Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, Christian.Tismer, Robin.Schreiber, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, haberman2, jcea, jhaberman, lekma, loewis, mattip, petr.viktorin, pitrou, seberg, steve.dower
Date 2021-09-23.21:26:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> It's better to pass the metaclass as a function argument, as with bases. I'd prefer adding a new function that using a slot.

Bases are available both as a slot (Py_tp_bases) and as an argument (PyType_FromSpecWithBases).  I don't see why this has to be an either/or proposition.  Both can be useful.

Either would satisfy my use case.  I'm constructing N such classes, so the spec won't be statically initialized anyway and the initialization issues on Windows don't apply.
Date User Action Args
2021-09-23 21:26:50haberman2setrecipients: + haberman2, loewis, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, Arfrever, petr.viktorin, lekma, Alexander.Belopolsky, mattip, Robin.Schreiber, steve.dower, seberg, Christian.Tismer, jhaberman
2021-09-23 21:26:50haberman2setmessageid: <>
2021-09-23 21:26:50haberman2linkissue15870 messages
2021-09-23 21:26:50haberman2create