Message 401366 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	erlendaasland
Recipients	erlendaasland, petr.viktorin
Date	2021-09-08.10:00:53
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1631095253.17.0.726435692023.issue45126@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> If we deprecate but keep the buggy behavior it as it is, (1) is not needed. Less work for both us and the users. Indeed. There's still a ref leak I'd like to take care of, though: if the first audit fails, database_obj leaks.

> If we deprecate but keep the buggy behavior it as it is, (1) is not needed. Less work for both us and the users.

Indeed.

There's still a ref leak I'd like to take care of, though: if the first audit fails, database_obj leaks.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-09-08 10:00:53	erlendaasland	set	recipients: + erlendaasland, petr.viktorin
2021-09-08 10:00:53	erlendaasland	set	messageid: <1631095253.17.0.726435692023.issue45126@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-09-08 10:00:53	erlendaasland	link	issue45126 messages
2021-09-08 10:00:53	erlendaasland	create