➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, kj, python-dev, sransara, toburger
Date 2021-09-05.14:48:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJ+ecEYwUQnaibrRaTyBNFak93tZ6X=7fCatO916i5vb=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1630830210.7.0.970792681827.issue44863@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content 
Updating an existing (standards track) PEP significantly is not
traditional. I recommend writing a new PEP.

On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 01:24 Ken Jin <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Ken Jin <kenjin4096@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Guido, OP has kindly written a mini PEP for this. Do you think just
> updating PEP 589 is sufficient, or do we need a full PEP?
>
> (PS. Changed version to 3.11 since we've missed the train for 3.10
> enhancements).
>
> ----------
> versions:  -Python 3.10
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44863>
> _______________________________________
>
-- 
--Guido (mobile)
History
Date User Action Args
2021-09-05 14:48:32gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, python-dev, kj, sransara, toburger
2021-09-05 14:48:32gvanrossumlinkissue44863 messages
2021-09-05 14:48:32gvanrossumcreate