Message399620
> GH-27772 reverts the behaviour change but keeps the fix for the undefined behaviour. Can the backport of GH-27772 to the 3.10 branch go in before 3.10.0 final?
Thanks for checking with me!
Given that this is fixing a bug that we introduced in rc1, I think it makes sense to backport to fix it. I have reviewed the code in GH-27772 and is contained enough, so I think is a good idea to go ahead.
Thanks Mark for all the work! |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-08-15 14:37:00 | pablogsal | set | recipients:
+ pablogsal, tim.peters, twouters, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, lukasz.langa, seberg, miss-islington |
2021-08-15 14:37:00 | pablogsal | set | messageid: <1629038220.86.0.249641218169.issue44698@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-08-15 14:37:00 | pablogsal | link | issue44698 messages |
2021-08-15 14:37:00 | pablogsal | create | |
|