This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author andrei.avk
Recipients Windson Yang, andrei.avk, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, nedbat, orlnub123, pablogsal, rhettinger, roysmith, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, terry.reedy, xtreak
Date 2021-08-13.22:18:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1628893117.77.0.778465864519.issue35105@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
In the last message I've said that according to __dict__ docs, anything in __dict__ is an attribute of respective obj. That's a bit too-strongly worded, the docs can be understood in the sense that anything that ends up in __dict__ via other mechanisms, such as dotted notation or setattr(), is an attribute.

Since direct manipulation of __dict__ is not prohibited, and no limits are set, AFAIK, on keys that can be used for __dict__, the more natural reading of the docs is that anything that can be directly set in __dict__ is also an attribute.

The only thing that would make a user doubt this reading is if he or she finds that getattr() cannot get non-string attrs, and going by its name, user would assume you can get any valid attrs using getattr().
History
Date User Action Args
2021-08-13 22:18:37andrei.avksetrecipients: + andrei.avk, rhettinger, terry.reedy, roysmith, nedbat, steven.daprano, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal, Windson Yang, xtreak, orlnub123
2021-08-13 22:18:37andrei.avksetmessageid: <1628893117.77.0.778465864519.issue35105@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-08-13 22:18:37andrei.avklinkissue35105 messages
2021-08-13 22:18:37andrei.avkcreate