I was trying to construct an ast object dynamically and I think I can identify some potential issue.

With the following snippet:

```
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import ast
import sys

print(sys.version)

good = ast.Assign(
    targets=[ast.Name(id="hello", ctx=ast.Store())],
    value=ast.Constant(value="world"),
    lineno=1
)
print(ast.unparse(good))


bad = ast.Assign(
    targets=[ast.Name(id="hello", ctx=ast.Store())],
    value=ast.Constant(value="world"),
)
print(ast.unparse(bad))
```

On my box the output looks like:

```
3.9.6 (default, Jun 29 2021, 05:25:02)
[Clang 12.0.5 (clang-1205.0.22.9)]
hello = 'world'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/xiaket/py.py", line 19, in <module>
    print(ast.unparse(bad))
  File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.6/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/ast.py", line 1572, in unparse
    return unparser.visit(ast_obj)
  File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.6/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/ast.py", line 801, in visit
    self.traverse(node)
  File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.6/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/ast.py", line 795, in traverse
    super().visit(node)
  File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.6/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/ast.py", line 407, in visit
    return visitor(node)
  File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.6/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/ast.py", line 858, in visit_Assign
    if type_comment := self.get_type_comment(node):
  File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.6/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/ast.py", line 786, in get_type_comment
    comment = self._type_ignores.get(node.lineno) or node.type_comment
AttributeError: 'Assign' object has no attribute 'lineno'
```

As I can understand, when we need to construct the Assign object, we'll need to provide two keyword arguments, targets and value. We don't need to provide the `lineno` as it should be an attribute of the statement node. Also, if we don't run `unparse` against the object, apparently it works fine.

I think in the `get_type_comment` method, we are making the assumption that the lineno is set automatically, this is true when we are parsing python source code as string. But when we are creating the object from scratch, we don't have that `lineno` attribute and it will fail.