Message399062
> do you feel like that new article is a good drop-in replacement for the old one?
No really, no. :-( I also now see that the new article has a (broken) link to the old article, which makes me think that maybe the removal of the old article was unintentional. We should probably find a way to report this upstream.
I think I'd go for dropping the existing broken Mozilla URL and then possibly looking for other good sources. Perhaps solicit suggestions on discuss.python.org? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-08-06 08:12:45 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, docs@python, jack__d |
2021-08-06 08:12:45 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1628237565.73.0.119567258933.issue44830@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-08-06 08:12:45 | mark.dickinson | link | issue44830 messages |
2021-08-06 08:12:45 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|