Author seberg
Recipients gregory.p.smith, lukasz.langa, mark.dickinson, miss-islington, seberg, tim.peters, twouters
Date 2021-08-04.18:29:00
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1628101740.96.0.462698591511.issue44698@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Hmm, sorry, I overshot/misread :(.

The thing that the NumPy test-suite trips over is that:

    c_powi(inf+0j, 3)

seems to not raise, but:

    _Py_c_pow(inf+0j, 3.+0j)

(or nan+0.j rather then inf+0j)

does seem to raise (returning `nan+nanj` in both cases).  If this is the `inf` code path, raising an error may actually be fix and the integer code path should maybe also do it.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-08-04 18:29:00sebergsetrecipients: + seberg, tim.peters, twouters, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, lukasz.langa, miss-islington
2021-08-04 18:29:00sebergsetmessageid: <1628101740.96.0.462698591511.issue44698@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-08-04 18:29:00seberglinkissue44698 messages
2021-08-04 18:29:00sebergcreate