Message398363
> the problem with namer solution is that it will stop respecting backupCount parameter
Not necessarily, as far as I can tell. Can you give a specific rationale for your statement - how does that happen, if the namer has been implemented carefully enough? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-07-28 09:52:14 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, rhettinger, kh14821, alexander.smirnoff |
2021-07-28 09:52:14 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1627465934.41.0.230132275345.issue43344@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-07-28 09:52:14 | vinay.sajip | link | issue43344 messages |
2021-07-28 09:52:14 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|