This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, SilentGhost, gvanrossum, iritkatriel, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date 2021-06-17.05:13:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1623906784.62.0.330586679415.issue23316@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Would not be be better in long term to get rid of irregularities? It would make the grammar simpler and the documentation clearer.

The only use case of such syntax in wrappers, but they always can be rewritten in other style, with natural order of arguments evaluation.

    def wrapper(*args, **kw):
        return wrapped_fn(*args, some_arg=1, **kw)
History
Date User Action Args
2021-06-17 05:13:04serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, terry.reedy, r.david.murray, SilentGhost, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, iritkatriel
2021-06-17 05:13:04serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1623906784.62.0.330586679415.issue23316@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-06-17 05:13:04serhiy.storchakalinkissue23316 messages
2021-06-17 05:13:04serhiy.storchakacreate