Message394593
I'm very much of the practicality beats purity philosophy, so I want to support the OP's flag without making them jump through hoops.
On the flip side, I also appreciate that there are folks that want the extra security...
So here's my plan: remove the creation time check (which will remove the error for the OP), and then add a decorator to the enum module that does that creation time check -- just like the `unique` decorator enforces no aliases.
Now I just need a good name for that decorator:
- complete ?
- exhaustive ?
- all_named ?
- check_for_unnamed ? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-05-27 20:16:18 | ethan.furman | set | recipients:
+ ethan.furman, jbelmonte, veky, hroncok, pablogsal, Manjusaka, John Belmonte, hauntsaninja |
2021-05-27 20:16:18 | ethan.furman | set | messageid: <1622146578.13.0.166879219264.issue44242@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-05-27 20:16:18 | ethan.furman | link | issue44242 messages |
2021-05-27 20:16:17 | ethan.furman | create | |
|