➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients matthewharrison, pablogsal, rhettinger, steven.daprano, tebeka, zkneupper
Date 2021-05-19.14:53:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1621436034.35.0.804361939054.issue44151@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Just to clarify, is the proposal to return a 
> regular tuple instead of named tuple?

No, it should still have named fields.  Either Line or LinearRegression would suffice.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-05-19 14:53:54rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tebeka, steven.daprano, pablogsal, zkneupper, matthewharrison
2021-05-19 14:53:54rhettingersetmessageid: <1621436034.35.0.804361939054.issue44151@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-05-19 14:53:54rhettingerlinkissue44151 messages
2021-05-19 14:53:54rhettingercreate