Message393154
> I can reproduce it on latest master running on Linux.
Interesting. Perhaps my actual change was to cause it to raise an error
earlier (outside of a handler)? Which would mean that the Path object
was always failing before, just silently.
Arguably we should filter them out instead, then, rather than
introducing a new supported type (as has been argued with similar
changes elsewhere) in a security branch. Though I'm sure the OP would
have noticed if their call was never returning any modules, so
presumably it must have worked somehow.
> I'm happy to open an PR, just let me know or if OP is not willing to do so either.
Feel free. I assume they'd have arrived with a PR if they were keen to
write it themselves. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-05-06 23:29:05 | steve.dower | set | recipients:
+ steve.dower, gregory.p.smith, lukasz.langa, shreyanavigyan, miguendes, rikard.nordgren |
2021-05-06 23:29:05 | steve.dower | link | issue44061 messages |
2021-05-06 23:29:04 | steve.dower | create | |
|