Message 391765 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	larry
Recipients	JelleZijlstra, barry, eric.smith, gvanrossum, kj, larry, lukasz.langa, methane, xtreak
Date	2021-04-24.07:41:23
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1619250083.83.0.296250642789.issue43817@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
For what it's worth: I changed the name to ONLY_IF_STRINGIZED in the PR. Since I propose that it be the default, everyone who called inspect.get_annotations(), and inspect.signature(), would use it. I think Pydantic would prefer it, because Pydantic wants to see the real objects at runtime, rather than the stringized annotations. If stringized annotations were deprecated in the future, then eval_str should be deprecated at the same time.

For what it's worth: I changed the name to ONLY_IF_STRINGIZED in the PR.

Since I propose that it be the default, everyone who called inspect.get_annotations(), and inspect.signature(), would use it.  I think Pydantic would prefer it, because Pydantic wants to see the real objects at runtime, rather than the stringized annotations.

If stringized annotations were deprecated in the future, then eval_str should be deprecated at the same time.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-04-24 07:41:23	larry	set	recipients: + larry, gvanrossum, barry, eric.smith, methane, lukasz.langa, JelleZijlstra, xtreak, kj
2021-04-24 07:41:23	larry	set	messageid: <1619250083.83.0.296250642789.issue43817@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-04-24 07:41:23	larry	link	issue43817 messages
2021-04-24 07:41:23	larry	create