Message 391265 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	orsenthil
Recipients	orsenthil, palik, vstinner, xtreak
Date	2021-04-16.23:24:04
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1618615444.55.0.738291768526.issue43871@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Treating this as bug in itself might be a better idea than waiting for a ipv6 scope introduction, which had few caveats. > Would it be an improvement if _checknetloc[2] validates the value of port properly? Yes, we could check if it is an int. That should be sufficient.

Treating this as bug in itself might be a better idea than waiting for a ipv6 scope introduction, which had few caveats. 

> Would it be an improvement if _checknetloc[2] validates the value of port properly?

Yes, we could check if it is an int. That should be sufficient.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-04-16 23:24:04	orsenthil	set	recipients: + orsenthil, vstinner, xtreak, palik
2021-04-16 23:24:04	orsenthil	set	messageid: <1618615444.55.0.738291768526.issue43871@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-04-16 23:24:04	orsenthil	link	issue43871 messages
2021-04-16 23:24:04	orsenthil	create