Message 391001 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	sco1
Recipients	Carl.Friedrich.Bolz, alimuldal, nedbat, pablogsal, rrauenza, sco1, serhiy.storchaka, shreyanavigyan
Date	2021-04-13.20:09:00
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1618344540.76.0.615732743974.issue43833@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Appreciate the additional historical context, I also was pointed to this in the documentation: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#whitespace-between-tokens If a parsing change is undesired from a backwards compatibility standpoint, would it be something that could be included in PEP 8?

Appreciate the additional historical context, I also was pointed to this in the documentation: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#whitespace-between-tokens

If a parsing change is undesired from a backwards compatibility standpoint, would it be something that could be included in PEP 8?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-04-13 20:09:00	sco1	set	recipients: + sco1, Carl.Friedrich.Bolz, nedbat, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal, shreyanavigyan, alimuldal, rrauenza
2021-04-13 20:09:00	sco1	set	messageid: <1618344540.76.0.615732743974.issue43833@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-04-13 20:09:00	sco1	link	issue43833 messages
2021-04-13 20:09:00	sco1	create