This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author BTaskaya
Recipients BTaskaya, gousaiyang, gvanrossum, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2021-04-11.17:18:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> I think I'd be okay if `foo[bar]: baz` and ` baz` (etc.) didn't generate any bytecode at all. Is that what you're proposing here? If so, and assuming the code is reasonably straightforward, I'd say go ahead and make a PR (and close the old OR).

The thread raised some concerns regarding the verification of the lhs (the target), so the PR 23952 generates code for the lhs but omits the annotation part.

> And FWIW changing how annotations are represented in the AST is out of scope for this issue. (There are tricky edge cases there too.)

Agreed, it already has a separate issue.
Date User Action Args
2021-04-11 17:18:34BTaskayasetrecipients: + BTaskaya, gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal, gousaiyang
2021-04-11 17:18:34BTaskayasetmessageid: <>
2021-04-11 17:18:34BTaskayalinkissue42737 messages
2021-04-11 17:18:34BTaskayacreate