Message390734
> So, should we reopen this ad add the flag to suppress __match_args__ generation after all?
I think so, although I'm still contemplating it.
I can't decide if we should also add match_arg=False to field(). Or is it good enough to just tell the user to manually set __match_args__ if they want that level of control? I think this is different enough from repr, init, etc. that we don't need to allow the per-field control, although maybe doing so would make the code more robust in terms of re-ordering or adding fields at a later date. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-04-10 19:17:45 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, gvanrossum, brandtbucher, freundTech |
2021-04-10 19:17:45 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1618082265.14.0.594803457435.issue43764@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-04-10 19:17:45 | eric.smith | link | issue43764 messages |
2021-04-10 19:17:45 | eric.smith | create | |
|