Message390198
Sometimes a leak is exactly what's wanted, i.e. a standing block of shared memory that allows sharing processes come and go ad libitum. I mention this because I haven't seen anyone mention it explicitly.
While turicas's monkeypatch covers the use case in which a manually-named block of shared memory is intended to remain indefinitely, it would be best if future versions of shared_memory allowed for such a use case, too. It shouldn't be necessary to monkeypatch in order to have a standing block of shared memory remain ready and waiting even when nobody's using it. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-04-04 16:06:28 | steve.newcomb | set | recipients:
+ steve.newcomb, pitrou, turicas, davin, pablogsal, vinay0410, damian.barabonkov, keven425 |
2021-04-04 16:06:28 | steve.newcomb | set | messageid: <1617552388.36.0.209351649072.issue38119@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-04-04 16:06:28 | steve.newcomb | link | issue38119 messages |
2021-04-04 16:06:28 | steve.newcomb | create | |
|