This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients BTaskaya, Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, rhettinger, v2m
Date 2021-03-22.20:49:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1616446198.17.0.75955255624.issue43563@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
This looks like a sensible idea to me. The safeguards to ensure that customized 'super' still works seem reasonable to me. I have to admit that I sometimes refrain from using super() where I should because of the expense, so this would be welcome.

I do wonder -- is two-arg super() important enough to support it at all? Maybe the code would be somewhat simpler if the special opcodes were only generated for zero-arg super() calls.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-03-22 20:49:58gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, rhettinger, Mark.Shannon, v2m, BTaskaya
2021-03-22 20:49:58gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1616446198.17.0.75955255624.issue43563@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-22 20:49:58gvanrossumlinkissue43563 messages
2021-03-22 20:49:58gvanrossumcreate