This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author EmilStenstrom
Recipients BTaskaya, EmilStenstrom, eric.smith, jack1142, mrabarnett, pablogsal, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, veky, xtreak
Date 2021-03-20.19:55:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1616270154.87.0.686695244066.issue43535@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Since the proposal is fully backwards compatible I don’t think preferring the old version is a reason against this nicer API. After all, people that like the current version can continue using it as they do today. 

Teaching Python to beginners is a great way to find the warts of a language (I’ve done it too). In the beginning people struggle with arrays and if-blocks, and having to go into how map and the str constructor work together to get a comma separated list of ints is just too much. Beginners are an important group of programmers that this proposal will clearly benefit.

I’m sure there will be some “None”-strings that will slip through this, but I think the upside far outweighs the downside in this case.

Big +1 from me.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-03-20 19:55:54EmilStenstromsetrecipients: + EmilStenstrom, rhettinger, terry.reedy, eric.smith, mrabarnett, serhiy.storchaka, veky, pablogsal, xtreak, BTaskaya, jack1142
2021-03-20 19:55:54EmilStenstromsetmessageid: <1616270154.87.0.686695244066.issue43535@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-20 19:55:54EmilStenstromlinkissue43535 messages
2021-03-20 19:55:54EmilStenstromcreate