This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients christian.heimes, docs@python, frankli, gousaiyang, steve.dower, vstinner, zkonge
Date 2021-03-12.23:55:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1615593344.02.0.483248792999.issue43438@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
If someone offers a patch for replacing the list of per-interpreter hooks with something not easily discoverable via gc, I'm sure we'd take it. It's all internal, so just hiding it from the list of bases should be fine (there should never be more than one reference), but turning it into a new form of dynamically expanding array/list would also work, providing whoever reviews it doesn't think it's adding too much complexity/instability.

But file that as a separate issue, please. It's somewhat debatable, while fixing the docs _needs_ to happen. (And I will get to it eventually if nobody else does, but I'm just as happy to review someone else's contribution. And MUCH happier to review a contribution than to argue about it on the tracker :) )
History
Date User Action Args
2021-03-12 23:55:44steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, vstinner, christian.heimes, docs@python, zkonge, gousaiyang, frankli
2021-03-12 23:55:44steve.dowersetmessageid: <1615593344.02.0.483248792999.issue43438@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-12 23:55:44steve.dowerlinkissue43438 messages
2021-03-12 23:55:43steve.dowercreate