This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author David.Edelsohn
Recipients Arfrever, David.Edelsohn, christian.heimes, cstratak, glaubitz, lukasz.langa, mcepl
Date 2021-02-21.15:24:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>

The Python Community Code of Conduct also states:

Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences.
Showing empathy towards other community members.

Various developers are passionate about this topic and the entire series of comments has been respectful, IMHO. I don't believe that it is helpful when you cherry-pick a rule from the code of conduct in response to someone providing additional evidence. That is intimidation and shutting down the conversation with an implicit threat.

You specifically mentioned m68k when you opened the issue.

This conversation feels very much that you and Victor have pre-determined an outcome and are not open to other points of view.  I and others have proposed compromises, but the response appears, at least to me, as shifting requirements.
Date User Action Args
2021-02-21 15:24:12David.Edelsohnsetrecipients: + David.Edelsohn, christian.heimes, mcepl, Arfrever, lukasz.langa, cstratak, glaubitz
2021-02-21 15:24:12David.Edelsohnsetmessageid: <>
2021-02-21 15:24:12David.Edelsohnlinkissue43179 messages
2021-02-21 15:24:11David.Edelsohncreate