Message386140
Sorry, I lost this bug in my TODO list :(
> > I don't think it's necessary here.
>
> Did you read my rationale (first message)? Do you mean that per-interpreter GIL is not worth it?
Right, I mean that it it is not worth breaking the C-API for all existing modules.
Instead, I think that it can be done as an addition: only modules that don't use things like these static types would be allowed in subinterpreters that have their own GIL. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-02-02 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | set | recipients:
+ petr.viktorin, vstinner, shihai1991 |
2021-02-02 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | set | messageid: <1612271573.38.0.235251337608.issue40601@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-02-02 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | link | issue40601 messages |
2021-02-02 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | create | |
|