Author vstinner
Recipients Alexandru Ardelean, Frederik Rietdijk, Ray Donnelly, barry, benjamin.peterson, bmwiedemann, brett.cannon, dstufft, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eschwartz, jefferyto, mcepl, methane, miss-islington, sascha_silbe, vstinner
Date 2020-12-31.12:11:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1609416675.09.0.105299908733.issue29708@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> note the optimized .pyc is deterministic. As far as I know only __debug__ is set to False, or is there something else different?

Hum, maybe there is a misunderstanding on the PEP 552 purpose.

I understood that the main point of the PEP 552 is to compare hash(<source code>), rather than checking the .py and .pyc file modification time.

It doesn't magically make the PYC file content fully reproducible. Correct me if I misunderstood PEP 552 as well.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-12-31 12:11:15vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, barry, brett.cannon, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, mcepl, eric.araujo, sascha_silbe, methane, dstufft, bmwiedemann, Frederik Rietdijk, Alexandru Ardelean, Ray Donnelly, eschwartz, miss-islington, jefferyto
2020-12-31 12:11:15vstinnersetmessageid: <1609416675.09.0.105299908733.issue29708@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-12-31 12:11:15vstinnerlinkissue29708 messages
2020-12-31 12:11:15vstinnercreate