Message383782
Since the PyTypeObject structure is excluded from the limited C API and the stable ABI on purpose (PEP 384), I don't see the purpose of the Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG flag.
Moreover, a new flag was added recently:
#if !defined(Py_LIMITED_API) || Py_LIMITED_API+0 >= 0x030A0000
/* Type has am_send entry in tp_as_async slot */
#define Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_AM_SEND (1UL << 21)
#endif
Should it be also removed?
For example, Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_FINALIZE was deprecated in bpo-32388 by:
commit ada319bb6d0ebcc68d3e0ef2b4279ea061877ac8
Author: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Date: Wed May 29 22:12:38 2019 +0200
bpo-32388: Remove cross-version binary compatibility requirement in tp_flags (GH-4944)
It is now allowed to add new fields at the end of the PyTypeObject struct without having to allocate a dedicated compatibility flag i
n tp_flags.
This will reduce the risk of running out of bits in the 32-bit tp_flags value.
By the way, is it worth it to remove Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_FINALIZE? Or is it going to break too many extension modules? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-12-25 23:48:07 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, pitrou, petr.viktorin |
2020-12-25 23:48:07 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1608940087.88.0.458230907712.issue42747@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-12-25 23:48:07 | vstinner | link | issue42747 messages |
2020-12-25 23:48:07 | vstinner | create | |
|