This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steven.daprano
Recipients jaraco, mariocj89, ncoghlan, steven.daprano, vstinner
Date 2020-12-16.10:30:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20201216102952.GR9927@ando.pearwood.info>
In-reply-to <1608114144.71.0.944348492215.issue42654@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
> Additionally, it suffers from the same issue as 
> sitecustomize. It is a single file that won't be a real substitute for 
> code execution in pth files.

I thought that the consensus in b.p.o. #33944 is that code execution in 
pth files is an anti-feature that must be removed, not something to 
merely move into a new file type or location.

(I may be wrong, I'll admit I haven't read the entire thread in 33944.)
History
Date User Action Args
2020-12-16 10:30:33steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, jaraco, ncoghlan, vstinner, mariocj89
2020-12-16 10:30:33steven.dapranolinkissue42654 messages
2020-12-16 10:30:32steven.dapranocreate