Message382810
If this is going to be closed as rejected, I think it still needs some improvement to the documentation. Right now, the docs for abstractproperty (deprecated in favor of combining property and abstractmethod) state:
"If only some components are abstract, only those components need to be updated to create a concrete property in a subclass:"
This heavily implies that if *all* components of the property are abstract, they must *all* be updated to create a concrete property on the subclass, when that is not the case (it's documenting a special way of overriding just one component by borrowing the base class, not a normal means of defining a property). If nothing else, mentioning this quirk in the docs seems like it would save confusion (e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65224767/python-abstract-property-cant-instantiate-abstract-class-with-abstract-me ). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-12-09 22:41:44 | josh.r | set | recipients:
+ josh.r, gvanrossum, rhettinger, docs@python, arn.vollebregt.kpn |
2020-12-09 22:41:44 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1607553704.72.0.339336631888.issue39707@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-12-09 22:41:44 | josh.r | link | issue39707 messages |
2020-12-09 22:41:44 | josh.r | create | |
|