Message382696
Hi, Austin.
If it's something that can be implemented in a library (which this suggestion qualifies as), then we typically want to see it on PyPI and to gain some traction there. I only suggested argparse-types because it also has some argparse add-ons. But you could certainly make a new package on PyPI.
But even then I'm not sure this would make it into the stdlib. For add-on functionality we're usually happy to leave things on PyPI. On the other hand, paths are somewhat more fundamental than some of the things in argparse-types. You might want to bring it up on the python-ideas mailing list and see how much support you get there. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-12-07 23:15:28 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, rhettinger, paul.j3, ascola |
2020-12-07 23:15:28 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1607382928.84.0.0961102612312.issue42572@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-12-07 23:15:28 | eric.smith | link | issue42572 messages |
2020-12-07 23:15:28 | eric.smith | create | |
|