Message382458
I forgot to mention the conclusion: my conclusion is that although the GC is resilient to these shenanigans (it was also extensive validation along with the algorithm), I still prefer to track it on the next() call because is technically the right thing to do: A tuple has been mutated so it must be (potentially) tracked because it needs to behave "AS IF" the tuple was being created from scratch. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-12-03 23:34:18 | pablogsal | set | recipients:
+ pablogsal, tim.peters, rhettinger, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, brandtbucher |
2020-12-03 23:34:18 | pablogsal | set | messageid: <1607038458.29.0.560963162751.issue42536@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-12-03 23:34:18 | pablogsal | link | issue42536 messages |
2020-12-03 23:34:18 | pablogsal | create | |
|