➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author p-ganssle
Recipients akira, barry, ju-sh, maxballenger, mdk, p-ganssle, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, thejcannon, victorg, ypank
Date 2020-11-23.15:11:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1606144265.95.0.827719594487.issue21041@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
I think you may have confused my thoughts as to why this might be considered ambiguous with an actual suggestion for what the semantics should be.

I think that we should stick with `p.parents[x] == tuple(p.parents)[x]` for any valid value of `x`, which means that `p.parents[-1]` will always be `Path('.')` for any non-empty `p`.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-11-23 15:11:06p-gansslesetrecipients: + p-ganssle, barry, pitrou, r.david.murray, akira, serhiy.storchaka, mdk, thejcannon, ju-sh, victorg, maxballenger, ypank
2020-11-23 15:11:05p-gansslesetmessageid: <1606144265.95.0.827719594487.issue21041@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-11-23 15:11:05p-gansslelinkissue21041 messages
2020-11-23 15:11:05p-gansslecreate