`python -m mod` sets `sys.argv[0]` to the `mod.__file__` according to https://docs.python.org/3.9/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption-m

> If ["-m"] is given, the first element of sys.argv will be the full path to the module file (while the module file is being located, the first element will be set to "-m").

But `__file__` may not exist according to https://docs.python.org/3.9/reference/import.html#__file__

> __file__ is optional. If set, this attribute’s value must be a string. The import system may opt to leave __file__ unset if it has no semantic meaning (e.g. a module loaded from a database).

More technically, `__spec__.origin` is the source of `__file__`, and the former may be `None`, according to https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/importlib.html#importlib.machinery.ModuleSpec.origin

> (__file__)
>
> Name of the place from which the module is loaded, e.g. “builtin” for built-in modules and the filename for modules loaded from source. Normally “origin” should be set, but it may be None (the default) which indicates it is unspecified (e.g. for namespace packages).

`python -m mod` sets sys.argv[0] to `mod.__spec__.origin` at Lib/runpy.py:196

It seems clear to me that the code is doing the right thing relative to the documentation for `-m`. But as #26388 and https://github.com/indygreg/PyOxidizer/issues/307 show, embedded Python runs into the semantic conflict with the documented behavior of `__spec__.origin` and `__file__`.


My proposed resolution of this contradiction is to set `sys.argv[0] = sys.orig_argv[0]` or, even better, `sys.argv[0] = sys.executable` when `PyConfig.run_module` is set but the named module's `__spec__.origin` is `None`.