Author pablogsal
Recipients Mark.Shannon, pablogsal
Date 2020-11-03.13:49:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1604411358.44.0.124409506475.issue42246@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Dead code elimination will remove the `secret_debugging_code()`, but leave the test. The peephole optimiser can then reduce it to a NOP, but won't eliminate it as it is the only instruction for line 1.

Gotcha. I am pretty sure that this will have a similar problem as the coverage people were claiming when we were not properly removing all dead code (slightly less coverage percentage). This is not a problem of course, but we should ping the coverage folks so they are aware of this.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-11-03 13:49:18pablogsalsetrecipients: + pablogsal, Mark.Shannon
2020-11-03 13:49:18pablogsalsetmessageid: <1604411358.44.0.124409506475.issue42246@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-11-03 13:49:18pablogsallinkissue42246 messages
2020-11-03 13:49:17pablogsalcreate