Message 380148 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	armins.bagrats
Recipients	armins.bagrats
Date	2020-11-01.15:48:23
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1604245703.4.0.361207259352.issue42234@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
In the docs (https://docs.python.org/3/library/pathlib.html#pathlib.PurePath.relative_to) PurePath.relative_to() is specified to fail for arguments that are not on the original path (e.g. Path('/ham/beans').relative_to(Path('/spam'))). I believe it would be useful to extend the behaviour of relative_to so that it handles the case above. For example, I would expect Path('/ham/beans').relative_to(Path('/spam')) to return Path('../ham/beans'). If this sounds like a useful change I'd be happy to make a PR for it.

In the docs (https://docs.python.org/3/library/pathlib.html#pathlib.PurePath.relative_to) PurePath.relative_to() is specified to fail for arguments that are not on the original path (e.g. Path('/ham/beans').relative_to(Path('/spam'))).

I believe it would be useful to extend the behaviour of relative_to so that it handles the case above. For example, I would expect Path('/ham/beans').relative_to(Path('/spam')) to return Path('../ham/beans').

If this sounds like a useful change I'd be happy to make a PR for it.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-11-01 15:48:23	armins.bagrats	set	recipients: + armins.bagrats
2020-11-01 15:48:23	armins.bagrats	set	messageid: <1604245703.4.0.361207259352.issue42234@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-11-01 15:48:23	armins.bagrats	link	issue42234 messages
2020-11-01 15:48:23	armins.bagrats	create