Author vstinner
Recipients Mark.Shannon, barry, corona10, methane, nascheme, pablogsal, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2020-11-01.14:34:08
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1604241249.02.0.848673195735.issue42115@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> because you'd cache a pointer to the specific `+` operator implementation

You should have a look at "INCA: Inline Caching meets Quickening in Python 3.3":
https://bugs.python.org/issue14757

Stefan Brunthaler wrote a paper on his work:
"Inline Caching Meets Quickening" (Published in ECOOP 2010)
https://publications.sba-research.org/publications/ecoop10.pdf
History
Date User Action Args
2020-11-01 14:34:09vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, barry, nascheme, methane, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, corona10, pablogsal
2020-11-01 14:34:09vstinnersetmessageid: <1604241249.02.0.848673195735.issue42115@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-11-01 14:34:09vstinnerlinkissue42115 messages
2020-11-01 14:34:08vstinnercreate