➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steven.daprano
Recipients steven.daprano, yurzo
Date 2020-10-02.01:00:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20201002005958.GO2186@ando.pearwood.info>
In-reply-to <1601570248.43.0.143406560443.issue41904@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content 
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 04:37:28PM +0000, Damian Yurzola wrote:
> I was inspired to file this bug after reading through a multiplicity 
> of bugs introduced by folks confused by the library's behavior.

Are these public bug reports or private anecdotes?

I'm not saying that the method cannot be deprecated or removed, but it 
needs to be justified. We don't break people's code gratuitiously, at 
least not intentionally. If you make a good enough case for deprecating 
the method, we can do so.

> What do you say about the unnecessarily redefined properties?
> 
> Lines Lib/datetime.py#L1606 to datetime.py#L1620

I don't know. Do all the tests still pass if you take them out?
History
Date User Action Args
2020-10-02 01:00:11steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, yurzo
2020-10-02 01:00:11steven.dapranolinkissue41904 messages
2020-10-02 01:00:11steven.dapranocreate