➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Mark.Shannon, lukasz.langa, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, v2m, yselivanov
Date 2020-09-22.05:31:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1600752669.43.0.291816504954.issue41756@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
I agree that we should add PyIter_Send() (the name is discussable, but PyIter_Send LGTM) which should support iterators and objects with the send() method. It would be much more useful for user, and can replace PyGen_Send() in the interpreter core code. But merging the PR with PyGen_Send() was not a mistake. It was good to split the changes on smaller steps easier to review.

Vladimir, do you mind to create a new PR for PyIter_Send()? I seen its implementation in one of intermediate versions of your PR.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-09-22 05:31:09serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, scoder, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, v2m
2020-09-22 05:31:09serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1600752669.43.0.291816504954.issue41756@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-09-22 05:31:09serhiy.storchakalinkissue41756 messages
2020-09-22 05:31:09serhiy.storchakacreate