Message377008
> Since coroutines inherit the generator protocol more or less, I think "PyGen_Send()" is a more suitable name, better than "PyCoro_Send()".
OK, +1. PyGen_Send it is.
> Also should it be specific to generators/coroutines and accept PyGenObject*
I think it should be specific to generators and coroutines. Calling `PyObject_CallMethodIdOneArg(coro, &PyId_send, arg);` and interpreting exceptions to emulate the low level API seems a bit too much. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-09-16 18:27:41 | yselivanov | set | recipients:
+ yselivanov, scoder, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, v2m |
2020-09-16 18:27:41 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1600280861.59.0.291569523631.issue41756@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-09-16 18:27:41 | yselivanov | link | issue41756 messages |
2020-09-16 18:27:41 | yselivanov | create | |
|