Message377006
I'm happy to see this moving forward.
Not convinved of the "PyIter_Send()" name, though. I don't consider this part of the iterator protocol. It's specific to generators and coroutines. Cython would probably guard its usage by "PyGen_CheckExact()" or "PyCoro_CheckExact()", and not use it for arbitrary iterators.
Since coroutines inherit the generator protocol more or less, I think "PyGen_Send()" is a more suitable name, better than "PyCoro_Send()". |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-09-16 18:15:39 | scoder | set | recipients:
+ scoder, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, v2m |
2020-09-16 18:15:38 | scoder | set | messageid: <1600280138.98.0.311160540791.issue41756@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-09-16 18:15:38 | scoder | link | issue41756 messages |
2020-09-16 18:15:38 | scoder | create | |
|