This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tim.peters
Recipients mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters
Date 2020-08-21.17:28:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1598030882.21.0.560921631586.issue41513@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> won't have a chance to work through it for a week or so

These have been much more in the way of FYI glosses. There's no "suggestion" here to be pursued - just trying to get a deeper understanding of code already written :-)

While I can concoct any number of cases where the add_on() method fails correct rounding, all the ones I dug into turned out to be "oops! went the wrong way" in nearest/even tie cases. By any non-anal measure, its accuracy is excellent.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-08-21 17:28:02tim.peterssetrecipients: + tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka
2020-08-21 17:28:02tim.peterssetmessageid: <1598030882.21.0.560921631586.issue41513@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-08-21 17:28:02tim.peterslinkissue41513 messages
2020-08-21 17:28:02tim.peterscreate