This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author youkaichao
Recipients youkaichao
Date 2020-08-14.04:57:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1597381070.63.0.19953658002.issue41547@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
According to the doc ( https://docs.python.org/3/library/pickle.html#object.__getstate__ ), an object may not have a __getstate__ method.

During pickling and unpickling, python first finds __getstate__ and __setstate__, which may invoke a customed __getattr__. I think this is unnecessary if python just provides a default implementation for __getstate__ / __setstate__ . An additional benefit of this is that __setstate__ and __getstate__ becomes available for every object and it is possible to do something like ``getstate(obj)``.

For people who customize __getattr__, I think no one intends to deal with ``obj.__getattr__(“__getstate__”)``, so it makes sense not to invoke ``__getattr__`` during pickling and unpickling.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-08-14 04:57:50youkaichaosetrecipients: + youkaichao
2020-08-14 04:57:50youkaichaosetmessageid: <1597381070.63.0.19953658002.issue41547@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-08-14 04:57:50youkaichaolinkissue41547 messages
2020-08-14 04:57:50youkaichaocreate