# PROBLEM

When using `functools.wraps`, the signature claims one set of defaults, but the (wrapped) function uses the original (wrappee) defaults.

Why might that be the desirable default?

# PROPOSED SOLUTION
Adding '__defaults__',  '__kwdefaults__' to `WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS` so that actual defaults can be consistent with signature defaults.

# Code Demo

```python
from functools import wraps
from inspect import signature

def g(a: float, b=10):
    return a * b

def f(a: int, b=1):
    return a * b

assert f(3) == 3

f = wraps(g)(f)

assert str(signature(f)) == '(a: float, b=10)'  # signature says that b defaults to 10
assert f.__defaults__ == (1,)  # ... but it's a lie!
assert f(3) == 3 != g(3) == 30  # ... and one that can lead to problems!
```

Why is this so? Because `functools.wraps` updates the `__signature__` (including annotations and defaults), `__annotations__`, but not `__defaults__`, which python apparently looks to in order to assign defaults.

One solution is to politely ask wraps to include these defaults.

```python
from functools import wraps, WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS, partial

my_wraps = partial(wraps, assigned=(list(WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS) + ['__defaults__', '__kwdefaults__']))

def g(a: float, b=10):
    return a * b

def f(a: int, b=1):
    return a * b

assert f(3) == 3

f = my_wraps(g)(f)

assert f(3) == 30 == g(3)
assert f.__defaults__ == (10,)  # ... because now got g defaults!
```

Wouldn't it be better to get this out of the box?

When would I want the defaults that are actually used be different than those mentioned in the signature?

<!--
Thanks for your contribution!
Please read this comment in its entirety. It's quite important.

# Pull Request title

It should be in the following format:

```
bpo-NNNN: Summary of the changes made
```

Where: bpo-NNNN refers to the issue number in the https://bugs.python.org.

Most PRs will require an issue number. Trivial changes, like fixing a typo, do not need an issue.

# Backport Pull Request title

If this is a backport PR (PR made against branches other than `master`),
please ensure that the PR title is in the following format:

```
[X.Y] <title from the original PR> (GH-NNNN)
```

Where: [X.Y] is the branch name, e.g. [3.6].

GH-NNNN refers to the PR number from `master`.

-->